home
icône

introduction

SRFC member states negotiate and sign fisheries agreements with international partners, governments and private entities, through which they grant foreign partners access to the fishery resources of their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ). However, many of these countries are afflicted by major shortcomings in their respective capacities to negotiate good agreements, which is mostly related to urgent needs for foreign exchange and limited limited organisational and technical capacities. Their need for foreign currency weakens their negotiating position as owners of much coveted fisheries resources. This weaknesses is exacerbated by a lack of scientific and technical collaboration between the seven countries of the sub region.

In light of this situation, the SRFC, with the support of the WWF and other PRCM partners (Regional Conservation Program for the Coastalal and Marine Zone of West Africa) set up a project to strenngthen the negotiation capacity of SRFC member countries. Designed to run for three years, this project aims at enhancing the capacity of SRFC member States in negotiating more equitable and sustainable fishing agreements.

The work program of the project was developed in consultation with SRFC members, during a workshop held in Saly Portudal, Senegal, from 20th to 22nd June 2005, under the aegis of the SRFC. Member countries were represented through high-ranking officials from the respective fisheries administrations.

 

icône

choice of priorities and development of the work plan

Following the closure of the workshop, and based on the deliberations of the working groups, the team of experts met with the Marine Program Officer to develop a detailed work plan. Given the duration of the project, the available financial resources and the need to reduce the number of specific objectives to a manageable number, the team proceeded to a second priority ranking of the nine identified key issues.

Based on the cumulated ranks of four individual classifications, five issues were initially selected. Following a discussion, two of these were regrouped, so that four specific objectives were eventually selected for the draft program proposal, as follows: